ext_376296 ([identity profile] fingertrouble.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] mellowtigger 2011-02-01 02:06 pm (UTC)

No, she isn't morally wrong, because she believed that they were harmless, however wrong. You go with the info you have, and you can never be 100% certain of anything.

If she'd ignored or known they were, then yes.
(27 comments)

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of people who comment anonymously.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.