boobquake: 2010 April 26 Monday

[mellowtigger]

I have a few female readers at this blog, and I wanted to make sure they all knew about this opportunity to display the supernatural power of their cleavage.  No, seriously.

We already know that the homosexuals are responsible for God allowing Americans to die at the hands of terrorists.  As it turns out, low necklines (and short shorts) are responsible for God sending earthquakes to destroy cities.  Who knew?  One of God's own prayer leaders, that's who.

""Many women who do not dress modestly ... lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which (consequently) increases earthquakes," Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi was quoted as saying by Iranian media. Sedighi is Tehran's acting Friday prayer leader."
- http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-ml-iran-earthquakes-promiscuity,0,6333394.story

Those are some mighty boobs, indeed.

Naturally, one bright woman thought of a way to test that theory.  Women: Plan on Monday to wear your clothes that are least modest.

I have a modest proposal.  Sedighi claims that not dressing modestly causes earthquakes. If so, we should be able to test this claim scientifically. You all remember the homeopathy overdose?  Time for a Boobquake.
- http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/in-name-of-science-i-offer-my-boobs.html

I'm tempted to start a parallel "moobquake" event in a masculine gesture of solidarity, but then we'd muddy the scientific purity of the experiment that is underway.  Instead, I'll just point everyone to the Facebook page for the event (and they already have 64,610 attendees registered):
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=116336578385346

Heterosexual men:  I'm sorry, but I don't know what to recommend.  Should you take your cameras to work on Monday in order to participate in the apparently-necessary immodest thoughts?  Or do you resist temptation so that we know for sure that the earthquake wrath is brought upon us solely because of those wicked women ways?  This confused homosexual is staying out of that debate.

Comments

:oD

[otterlover01.livejournal.com]

I am sharing this one with my friends at Facebook and Multiply! And we thoguth we had exclusivity about religious nutcases here at our cherished West! HAHAHA
Thanks for sharing Terry! Big hugs my friend, Luis. :o)

Re: :oD

[mellowtigger]

Yeah, it's strange that any time the religious try to make their belief have an influence in this real physical world, it's just so painfully obvious that they can't produce the evidence.

And when their threats fail to play out in the real world, they too often end up taking retribution into their own hands. It's very impatient of them, not waiting for God to deliver punishment according to the Divine schedule.

[bluebear2.livejournal.com]

Sigh...

It can be so scary to not know why the earth shakes or lightning strikes something or a forest fire starts or a flood happens that people who aren't educated try to alleviate their own fear that it could happen to them by reasoning that it was caused by the victims' behaviours therefore they themselves are safe.

[mellowtigger]

I happen to like animism, but anthropomorphic animism does have its dangers. (Deity not-so-mysteriously ends up hating all the same people as the believers.)

[pi3832.livejournal.com]

As a heterosexual male I can confirm that boobs do have mysterious, potent and dangerous powers.

Earthquakes? Well, that might be a bit much. But we'll never know for sure until we try!

[mellowtigger]

I'm not able to contribute either boobs or temptation to the event, but I thought maybe I could help out just by passing the word along. :)