![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
circumcision news
2008-Jan-07, Monday 12:11 pmIt's been known for a while now that circumcision reduces rates of HIV infection in men. It has something to do (so the thinking goes) with the loss of softer tissue which is an easier route of transmission for the virus. What caught my interest, though, was this BBC report that a new study also says there is no detrimental effect on enjoyment of the sexual experience.
That result seems profoundly counter-intuitive to me. I found the abstract for the article, but I can't afford access to read the actual study itself. I'd like to know more detail about the kind of experiences they were asking about. Especially since their results seems to contradict other information about loss of sensitivity and even measurable loss of satisfaction in 20% of men circumcised after age 20. All that in addition to an understanding of circumcision as a painful process that amounts to genital mutilation.
This "oh, it doesn't affect sex at all" conclusion seems more like wishful graham cracker puritanical thinking to me. Call me skeptical.
That result seems profoundly counter-intuitive to me. I found the abstract for the article, but I can't afford access to read the actual study itself. I'd like to know more detail about the kind of experiences they were asking about. Especially since their results seems to contradict other information about loss of sensitivity and even measurable loss of satisfaction in 20% of men circumcised after age 20. All that in addition to an understanding of circumcision as a painful process that amounts to genital mutilation.
This "oh, it doesn't affect sex at all" conclusion seems more like wishful graham cracker puritanical thinking to me. Call me skeptical.