mellowtigger: (changed priorities)
[personal profile] mellowtigger
I should get this item out of the way now, so I can deal with more important political issues when the election is actually at hand.

The word today is that David Petraeus has essentially endorsed Hillary Clinton for president.  I don't have any particular problem with Hillary Clinton's politics. I think she's an intelligent woman. I think she has performed well as Secretary Of State. (I include her response to Benghazi, which did not represent what Republicans claimed.)  My problem with her possible candidacy is that she's the spouse of a former president.

I'm sick of dynasties.  It's that simple.  I agree with Barbara Bush on this topic, except that she doesn't go far enough.  She thinks it's acceptable that proximity grants privilege, but we should appear respectable by sharing privilege among more of the ruling class.  I think that mindset is exactly the problem here.  We're supposed to have a democracy instead of a plutocracy.  I will not vote for another Clinton.  Or another Bush, or another Obama, or another Kennedy.

I'd like to see Elizabeth Warren run for president someday.  I'd certainly vote for her.  Until then, I'll keep investigating third party candidates.

Date: 2014-02-09 11:40 pm (UTC)
furr_a_bruin: (Bear: Oh No!)
From: [personal profile] furr_a_bruin
I see your point and I do, to a degree, share your concern. That said, I think it's best addressed during the primary process by working to get someone else electable the Democratic nomination to begin with. Given the recent behavior of Rethuglicans, I will obviously not vote for them - but neither will I simply sit out the general election if Hillary Clinton is the nominee.


mellowtigger: (Default)

September 2017

1718192021 2223
2425262728 2930

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 21st, 2017 04:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios