pessimistic about the future biosphere
2008-Jun-28, Saturday 05:41 pmThat landing against the tree seems to require more repair than I had initially figured. I've been very tired and sleepy since then, seeming to rest up so my body can spend its energy on undoing some unseen damage. My lower back still hurts, but it's getting better. I have spackled skin where the tree bark roughed my back, but I see no sign of any serious harm. Still, I've slept 1.5 times as much as usual, and I blame my energy level for today's pessimism.
We're changing the content of our biosphere in so many ways:
No, all of that I could believe without getting depressed.
But now even NASA is getting desperate to ring the alarms, primarily as a result of the efforts of Dr. James Hansen, the director of the Goddard Institute of Space Sciences. This man has his own collection of worrying notes, but the pertinent one today is his look back at his last 20 years (pdf) working on just the issue of climate change. Part of me wishes that Homo sapiens would be included in the list of casualties in this now-unfolding 6th occurence of mass extinction in earth's history, as it would seem the only just outcome of our own influence. Or, at the very least, that we evolve into a less-intelligent (and less influential) species, as described by Kurt Vonnegut in his story, Galapagos.
If we ascribe agency to the anthropomorphic Mother Nature... maybe that's what She's preparing for. One can hope. (In such a pessimistic mood.)
We're changing the content of our biosphere in so many ways:
- atmosphere (through combustion vehicle exhaust and factory exhaust)
- soil (though mass ranching, and with pesticides through mass farming, maybe even with electricity)
- water (with chemicals carried by rain runoff from our cities, and with pharmaceuticals from our sewers, noise from our sonar)
- biodiversity (simply by carrying macro/micro living organisms across every spot of land on the globe every day, or by mechanizing the destruction of one local ecology to replace it with a new local ecology)
No, all of that I could believe without getting depressed.
But now even NASA is getting desperate to ring the alarms, primarily as a result of the efforts of Dr. James Hansen, the director of the Goddard Institute of Space Sciences. This man has his own collection of worrying notes, but the pertinent one today is his look back at his last 20 years (pdf) working on just the issue of climate change. Part of me wishes that Homo sapiens would be included in the list of casualties in this now-unfolding 6th occurence of mass extinction in earth's history, as it would seem the only just outcome of our own influence. Or, at the very least, that we evolve into a less-intelligent (and less influential) species, as described by Kurt Vonnegut in his story, Galapagos.
If we ascribe agency to the anthropomorphic Mother Nature... maybe that's what She's preparing for. One can hope. (In such a pessimistic mood.)
no subject
Date: 2008-Jun-29, Sunday 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-Jun-29, Sunday 12:56 pm (UTC)Mother Earth
Date: 2008-Jun-29, Sunday 06:42 am (UTC)http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/111
Re: Mother Earth
Date: 2008-Jun-29, Sunday 01:00 pm (UTC)Re: Mother Earth
Date: 2008-Jun-30, Monday 03:15 am (UTC)Still, there is probably some chemical side effects of making those too.
no subject
Date: 2008-Jun-29, Sunday 03:35 pm (UTC)I feel the same way. There's a word for it-- weltschmertz...
no subject
Date: 2008-Jun-30, Monday 01:59 am (UTC)I knew about anomie and hikikomori, but somehow I missed weltschmertz. And what's not to like about a comic book titled, Weltschmertz: Attack of the same-sex sleeper cells? *laugh*