new word: corollatype

2025-Jun-11, Wednesday 12:27 pm
mellowtigger: (Default)

I propose a new word for use in biological science: corollatype. This word is meant to be a counterpoint to karyotype whose etymological origin refers to the kernel, seed, or nucleus of a form. I chose corollatype as a reference to the biological corolla, which I understand as the collection of petals and reproductive organs on a flower. That term is derived from the latin word corona for crown or garland. Together, I intend this term to refer both to the physical form of the reproductive parts of an organism but also the appearance and behavior that draws attention to the sexual process too.

This term is meant to complete the following analogy:

Genotype is to Phenotype, as Karyotype is to    (blank)   .

Rephrased slightly to emphasize the utility here:

Genotype does not restrict an organism to a single Phenotype, just as Karyotype does not restrict an organism to a single Corollatype.

Used in this way, it would end the illogical gender-restrictive and anti-trans arguments, even before they start. It would require the proponent to first explain why, when Nature itself does not, they think they know what sexual appearance and behavior must be. If we need to quibble about Greek/Latin origins, then maybe peritype would be a better word choice to mean everything "near/around" the reproductive process of an organism (form and behavior)? Or maybe stemmatype as a reference to a crown or the ostentation that draws attention to the inner form?

I'm surprised that I haven't used this analogy on Dreamwidth before today. I've been searching for at least half a decade for a word to complete this analogy. I found an email to [personal profile] foeclan in 2020, where I was trying to find an even earlier mention that happened on a different social network, MeWe. Based on my experience with trying to ask the right question of AI, I tried to get a language model to create a new word to finish that analogy. Gemini was absolutely terrible at it. Copilot was much better. Copilot didn't give me the new word, but it pointed out the origin of karyo- as referring to kernel, which led me on my own to think of the other side of plant growth and flowering. So, AI got me there eventually but not directly.

Anyway, what do you think? Would such a term be useful? Is there a better word choice to select for this term?

I am not an anarchist

2025-May-19, Monday 10:39 pm
mellowtigger: (hypercube)

There are labels that I gladly accept and others that I reject.

For instance:

  • I am not a Democrat. Not since Bernie got sidelined the first time.
  • I am a progressive. Meaning I want continuing improvements in response to new empirical knowledge.
  • I am #antifa. And you should be too.
  • I am not an anarchist.

I should explain that last label, given my longstanding criticism of so many things here in the USA. I want great changes in government and economic structures, yes, but I still want structures. Anarchism has the debatably-laudable goal of making individuals each responsible for all outcomes. It plans to accomplish that goal, thanks to elimination of all hierarchy as a form of coercion. Afterwards, individuals and their choices would be all that matters.

I've recommended the book "The Nature of Economies" by Jane Jacobs many times over the years. It uses easy ecological metaphors to teach ideas that are more complex. I propose a biological metaphor for understanding proposed anarchy. Show me the creature that was formerly a multicellular organism of specialized cells (requiring hierarchy of its own sort) that later backtracked to eliminate that specialization, where each cell becomes master of itself and must negotiate with other cells as equals. Show me how evolution has proved that simplification strategy as more adaptable than advanced specializations, then I'll believe that anarchism is viable at our level too. It seems at first glance, at least, that Mother Nature prefers constant change and reorganization, not mere simplification.

"You've got that eternal idiotic idea that if anarchy came it would come from the poor. Why should it? The poor have been rebels, but they have never been anarchists; they have more interest than anyone else in there being some decent government. The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all. Aristocrats were always anarchists."
- G.K. Chesterton

I still believe in the beauty of complex systems, and I still believe in the possibility of their actually serving the long-term needs of constituent components.

mellowtigger: joystick (gaming)

Something called "mana" is used frequently in computer fantasy games, but why is it called that? Why is it always depicted as something with a dark blue color? I don't know the history of the word, but this YouTube video asks these questions and tries to answer them.

I can't vouch for its etymological accuracy, but I played lots of hours of 3 video games that it mentions as having pivotal influence in this trend. The first was Dungeon Master (1987) on an Amiga, then Warcraft 2 (1995) and Diablo 1 (1997) on pc. These are all important titles in the genre, so I grew up immersed with "mana" as the fuel for magic, and it was always blue in color.

I'm looking for a word

2025-Jan-22, Wednesday 11:17 pm
mellowtigger: (book)

I'm playing a lot of the Pantheon MMO in my spare time. It is still years away from being complete, but there's more than enough to keep me entertained. I keep creating (and sometimes deleting then recreating) new characters to try out all of the different character classes and tradeskills. So far, my highest-progressing characters are shaman, wizard, and ranger. That experimentation process leads me to today's question.

My next character class will be a necromancer. In this game, they can perform an unusual and much-needed service called corpse summoning. When any player's character dies, they leave behind a visible corpse in the game world, still containing all of their character inventory. The player must return to that corpse to retrieve the money and items they carried at the time of their death. That's fine if the corpse is in a convenient location. If not... then corpse summoning is essential. A necromancer can target the currently-living character (respawned in town or other safe location) and magically teleport their distant corpse to them, where they conveniently retrieve all of their lost items.

For my necromancer, I want to learn the tradeskills of 1) carpentry for creation of bank boxes for large storage space which I have decided to call "coffins" and 2) provisioning for creation of meals and drinks which I will call "funeral gifts". So... I need a name that alludes either to "happy" funeral meals amongst the living or to those meals that are delivered with the dead into their tomb. I've been looking through pages about the times from modern practices back to ancient Egypt. So far, nothing stands out as a useful word for these offerings. At some point, I ran across the Latin silicernium, but I'm just not fond of it as a character name.

Are there any language aficionados out there who might know of a word that fulfills this description? I want to summon corpses for people in need, then afterwards hand them food and a bank storage box, saying something like: "Please accept this coffin and funerary meal. We wish the recently departed good luck and safe journey." I'm not even on a roleplay server, but some people do actually roleplay here. I'd just get a kick out of playing a good guide-to-the-afterlife, I think, rather than the expected evil death magician.

But I just can't figure out a character name yet.

mellowtigger: (old)

I continue to watch tv series on Viki, a cheaper alternative to western entertainment sites. These shows arrive with various spoken languages, and I watch the English subtitles. One interesting translation appeared in an animated series from China.

Click to read my romp through eastern tv dramas...

The plot sequence arrived like this in episode 166 of Soul Land:

  1. Character 1 expects to confront an opposing character 2 in the near future.
  2. Character 1 says, "She..." blah blah blah.
  3. Character 1 says, "She..." yadda yadda yadda.
  4. Character 1 finally meets character 2 for the first time.
  5. Character 1 says, "What?! You're a woman?!"

This narrative sequence is obviously ridiculous in English, where we foolishly insist on encoding gender into 3rd-person pronouns. In the original Chinese, it's a perfectly logical series of statements, where the subject's gender was irrelevant to the pronoun. I saw this episode and thought to myself, "Why can't English be more reasonable, like Chinese?" I thought this opinion too soon.

It turns out that I dislike pronouns in multiple languages, not just English. Over the course of this and other drama series, I came to another realization about this general group of Asian languages. Characters spend an undue amount of time conversing with each other about mistakes or changes over time to pronoun/nickname usage amongst each other. They don't encode gender, but they do encode social status. I'm stuck again wondering, "Why would anybody design a language like that?"

It seems like if someone wanted to design a language for egalitarian purposes (and I do) that simplified and made easy the polite form of addressing someone (and I do), humans wouldn't add such complications to the words that they blabber at one another. As I've written before (in 2023 and 2022), I conclude that at least in English, everyone should be called "they", and if people get to know each other well enough later to remember such details between themselves, then they can arrange other nicknames and chosen pro-names together. It reminds me of those exceptionally long and complicated manual gestures that people use sometimes, meant to signal who's part of the "in" group versus the "out" group. If you really want to do that amongst yourself, go ahead. You do you, as the saying goes. But don't require me to be part of it. I want a single, simplified form of communication that is always polite and always appropriate.

Separately, I worry that given the crop of humans that will soon take political control in the USA, it was maybe a bad idea to spend the last several years convincing people that it's perfectly normal to meet strangers and immediately ask them, disguised as a pronoun exchange, "What (gender identity) are you?" It seems much safer to just treat everyone we meet as a person, without requiring distinctions or levels of personhood. In English, I think such behavior would be encouraged by widespread use of "they" as the universal pronoun.

Profile

mellowtigger: (Default)
mellowtigger

About

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Page generated 2025-Jul-07, Monday 05:33 am