unreality

2025-Nov-17, Monday 07:07 pm
mellowtigger: (artificial intelligence)

I don't know how to trust anything I read or see online any more.

Just a few days ago, I started reading an article talking about archive.org and how it stopped doing some sort of widespread page collection in 2024 around the time of their DDOS attack. The article also mentioned Google stopping its "cached page" collection as a related event, leaving us now without any easy and trustworthy reference to past online experiences. Actual published information can now simply be made to disappear... gaslighting anyone who thought they remembered it.

I think the article intended to tie this chain of thinking to our current control by a few plutocrats over our broadcast and online media, providing them ample opportunity to manipulate our societies and politics for their economic benefit. It was a very long article, and I stopped reading it halfway through, intending to come back to it later. Today, I can't even remember which website it was at. It was an important article, but I've lost it in the aether. I really need a convenient replacement for Pocket, which is what I used for a long time to store webpages into categories for easy recall.

With AI videos, audio, and images all being so realistic, I just don't know how anyone can know anything beyond what they see with their own eyes. And our brain's memory is itself famously faulty. There are important political events happening on the world stage, and it's difficult to know for sure where to direct one's attention.

The only option that I can see is for everybody to record everything around them at all times. Then any disputed event can be compared against multiple data sources for corroboration. But I see people online freaking out about any recording of anything because you didn't ask permission of everyone in field of view. I'm so tired of this obligate ownership of everything everywhere. Can we stop thinking in capitalist terms?

I'm not sure where I'm going with this train of thought. I know that somehow this topic is related to technological telepathy, in this dystopian world where we suffer the manipulation of reality by forced control over recording and recall of events. Once again, I advocate total freedom instead of compartmentalized "ownership" of any experience, perspective, or opinion. The one thing I argue against is lies... the presentation of one thing as something else that it is not.

mellowtigger: (violent hypocrites)
I said in the past everything that needs to be said again today.

I still mean every single word of it.

I don't understand

2024-Jul-22, Monday 06:22 pm
mellowtigger: (Not Now Brian)

I don't understand anything that's happening any more.

I vaguely remember (it was after high school graduation for me) Biden being laughed off the national stage the first time he ran for President in 1988, because he was shown to lie as needed to get what he wanted. Fast forward to the 2020 election, where the 2nd and 3rd place candidates for the Democrat nomination both bowed out so the 4th place candidate could take 1st place, a candidate who promised to run for only a single term. Surprise, that promise was a lie. In 2024, Biden insisted repeatedly for months that he would run again for the Presidency. Until suddenly he didn't, passing the coronation baton to the candidate who performed so poorly in 2020 that they dropped out because they couldn't even pass Biden in 4th place.

And now... here we are. With that washed out candidate supposedly the savior of the Democrat party and by extension the USA. Because of the extended political season of the USA and this late exit within that season, there will be no proper DNC conversation about potential candidates. Remember when the DNC said in court that they have no obligation to democratically select a Democrat candidate? It was that experience in particular that prompted me to declare that I am not a Democrat. They found a good political drama to hide their non-democratic process this time, I guess? I would like to think that the president who declared COVID over (and put children back in classrooms and workers back into offices) had a welcome-to-reality moment with his recent COVID case and finally understood that he doesn't have the stamina for 4 more years as president. I'm sure, though, that it came down to the mega-donors telling him what to do.

None of this makes any rational sense. We have existential crises to address. Instead, the deliberative process that should save us is all lies and money and power. I guess the rest of you can have fun with even more "You have to vote for Team A, otherwise Team B will win!" since that seems to be the only constant for nearly an entire generation already. I just don't understand why everyone keeps supporting this particular status quo.

Brian does not understand, and neither do I. Seriously, I do not understand anything that happens any more.

mellowtigger: (violent hypocrites)
I said before everything that needed to be said.  Yet here we are again. There are so many mass shootings that we hardly need special attention for them anymore, lest we risk becoming The Onion reprinting the same article over and over again.

I've mentioned stochastic terrorism before. Keith Olbermann, of course, is using the same language for this event, because it's clear that Republicans in Colorado were speaking for years to encourage exactly this outcome. How many times have you heard about "grooming" from politicians during the last year? It's been popular in Florida for decades, the same place where somebody thinks they could challenge Trump for the presidency. There are no "sides" to an argument when one person thinks that other people just fundamentally should not exist at all. Somebody is grooming people, yes, but for violence. That's stochastic terrorism in a nutshell. AOC, my progressive hero and hopefully the next president, tells people to "connect the dots".

At its core, stochastic terrorism exploits one of our strongest and most complicated emotions: disgust.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-stochastic-terrorism-uses-disgust-to-incite-violence/ (free archive)

Family Guy racism color chart, with light-skinned colors labeled "Okay" and dark-skinned colors labeled "Not Okay"And this white-skinned terrorist previously was in custody for felony menacing and three counts of first-degree kidnapping for a bomb threat, but the District Attorney declined to prosecute then the court records were sealed. What now? Who was this District Attorney, a "bleeding heart liberal being soft on crime"? No, wait, it was a Republican who provided these answers during their recent campaign.

What areas of public policy are you personally passionate about?
As your next District Attorney, I promise to tackle the issues that pose a threat to our children, our laws, and our community.

Not knowing anything else about the bomb threat (because the records were sealed), I have to assume the Family Guy racism color chart is at play in this release. We learned nothing from Kyle Rittenhouse, it seems. This emboldened young white guy went on to demand in August that a newspaper remove its article about his arrest since no charges were filed. It's still online because, of course, the threat actually happened.  And he went on to mass murder.
mellowtigger: Cartman of South Park (authority)
I've said many times that police are not there to "protect and serve".  Not even with a protection order.  Not even within a government school.  Not even at Uvalde's massacre.

Maybe you dismissed my claim as progressive nonsense.  Here's a lawyer (YouTube, 15 minutes) describing the U.S. Supreme Court rationale for why it is established case law.

It's infuriating, but it's true.

Profile

mellowtigger: (Default)
mellowtigger

About

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
4 56 78 910
11 12 1314 15 16 17
1819 20 21 22 2324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Page generated 2026-Jan-24, Saturday 06:11 pm