Today's "Moody Monday" post puts me at risk of a US$10,000 fine in Texas, maybe even
prison. I think incarceration applies only to abortion providers, not information providers, but I'm not certain. Either way, it's a good reason to never set foot there. (Reminder:
Get out.) Indeed,
Facebook and Instagram are already censoring abortion information online. Google says it will
delete location history for abortion centers, but that may still not help
people who search the topic. You could search on computers at your local library, but safety depends on if your library follows
recommended practice. Eventually a VPN may be necessary to protect yourself and to access region-restricted websites.
People are sharing their experiences in abortion care, both receiving and providing it. They offer a lot to consider. From the woman with a
detached placenta to the doctors
delaying life-saving care like this
woman who miscarried but couldn't get medical help, also the
10-year-old rape victim whose young body is required by her current Ohio state law to carry to term the fetus of that criminal, and even the
coroner stories of botched abortions before legalization in Canada.
I advocate letting people control their own bodies as they wish, however complex those decisions are for them. One justification sometimes presented is the idea (more complicated than just a single variable) that allowing abortions nationwide with the Roe v. Wade court decision led to fewer "
unwanted children" in high poverty populations, leading to a
reduction in crime many years later. Personally, I don't really need that justification for legalization. I'm firmly in the camp that believes, as
the meme says about
baby Molly, that an embryo is simply not a person. Similarly, I can't believe a fetus is a person until it's at least
developed enough biologically to no longer remain a parasite, then we can start discussing the difficult definitions.
Plenty of mainstream religious traditions share this idea and
allow abortion. Even without abortion, some
40% of all pregnancies end in miscarriage naturally, which certainly doesn't make these women slaughterers for failing to deliver,
as the new laws insist. The idea is
insanity and can actually
prevent babies from being born to
families who need IVF to conceive. It's also already
endangering non-abortion medical care by its sheer stupidity.

Let's end this post, however, by noting the
central hypocrisy (both
Betty Bowers and
George Carlin elaborate well on this topic)
that got us here.
"The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated; unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor, they don't resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don't ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don't bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It's almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe.
Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.- Pastor
Dave Barnhart,
from Alabama
Welcome to Amurrika. The line forms
here for your pelvic exam.