mellowtigger: (artificial intelligence)
Facebook disappeared from the internet today.  It's disappearance had the knock-off effect of stressing other internet resources, affecting more than just Facebook.  The best explanation I've found (although most of it ranges into the "technical" category) is this blog post from a major provider of an important internet service.

I should reiterate here that nobody should be using Facebook products (Facebook, Instagram, Workplace, WhatsApp) anyway.  They are actively destabilizing American society, as well as other countries around the globe.  Do not encourage them.  A brave whistleblower explained why Facebook does it in this 13.5-minute video from CBS News.



*deadpan expression*  Yesterday.  The CBS story aired yesterday.  *glance at watch*  *glance at the above Facebook kerfuffle*  *deadpan expression*

I left Facebook a decade ago when a good alternative became available.  Although that alternative is now gone, there are others.  Twitter is still serviceable.  OpenBook (aka Okuna.io (soon to become Somus)) is available and will eventually be a good platform.  There are G+ refugees on MeWe.com, which is serviceable but has its own issues.

My point, anyway, is that I hope everyone chooses to stop funding the beast that is Facebook.  Go cold turkey.  Find someplace that doesn't incentivize outrage via unverified claims.

Maybe sign up for a Dreamwidth account?  You could blog.  I'm sure there must be mental health benefits to writing as well as reading stuff that's more than 280 characters and that isn't contained entirely within a meme image.  You know... thought provoking rather than outrage provoking.  Something that encourages linking to evidence that supports an opinion, so those justifications can be evaluated fairly.

At least consider it for me?  These dangerous times need thoughtful and informed minds.  I promise that you'll still find opposition to your ideas, but... they'll generally be well considered and well stated opinions.  That's a good environment for any society, isn't it?

about your passwords

2020-Jul-30, Thursday 01:53 am
mellowtigger: (security)
On Microsoft Windows, I know enough to be able to retrieve a lot of passwords from laptops where I already have a local account. It's not very hard, even. Don't think that your passwords in Windows are any more secure than that Post-It note that you keep under your keyboard.  (Hint:  Use Linux.)

For improved security anywhere, I recommend using KeePass as a password manager for generating individual passwords on each website you visit. It's not automatically integrated with your web browsers like some other products are, but that's a good thing.

"The three golden rules to ensure computer security are: do not own a computer; do not power it on; and do not use it."
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Morris_(cryptographer)

Over my many years as an Information Technology technician across several companies, many people have shared their passwords with me intentionally to allow for easy access to their profile for diagnostics and fixes. I've tried during the last year to break myself and everyone else of that bad habit. Some passwords that people use include curse words. That's okay. I'm not shocked. Really, I'm not. Passwords should be easy for the user to remember! I have never reported anyone for their private passwords that I learned.

credo for AnonymousBut...

I'll gloss over the muddy details by saying generically that Anonymous has doxed the police officers who are now awaiting trial for the murder of George Floyd here in Minneapolis. I've seen the file that's been offered. I know nothing about its authenticity.  Home addresses, social security numbers, credit card numbers. It's all there. But it's the passwords that I want to call your attention to now.

"Passwords: {mn311lane, thomlaa, nigger123}"

Please... if you are using racist, authoritarian, asshole passwords anywhere, please change them now.  As an I.T. worker, I consider my end users sort of like a psychiatrist, doctor, or priest would consider their charges, with an appreciation and urgent need for sacrosanct honesty that allows me to help correct problems and create a better order to a very messy world.  I have no desire to snitch on anyone about anything that I learn as a tech who helps users solve their reported problems, and I never have reported any such issues up the chain of authority.

But asshole passwords would make me consider a notice to Human Resources.  So don't do that.

Not ever.



mellowtigger: (mst3k)
I'm seeing more posts advertising different tv streaming services.  I'm not returning to Netflix until they pay their taxes.  Which of these free services do you recommend?

Which movie that's currently on offer do you recommend?
mellowtigger: (changed priorities)
I just cancelled my Netflix subscription. They wisely ask for reason for cancellation, and I entered this text in the "Other" section:

"you paid no taxes on record profits and you're raising rates? no. be a responsible corporation."

That's the succinct version, but there's more to the story.
  1. I was already disappointed that they were cancelling their Marvel comics shows. I especially liked Daredevil and Jessica Jones, but I watched every show that they produced: Luke Cage, Iron Fist, The Defenders, and The Punisher.  All of these cancellations arrived after they previously cancelled my favorite Netflix show of all time: Sense8.
  2. I had already seen the news every year that they keep making record profits. Not just gross income, but net profits.
  3. I saw the news that they paid no federal taxes. Even on record profits, they paid no federal taxes at all.
  4. Finally, I saw the notice that they were raising my subscription cost too, in spite of the above. That, finally, was the last straw.
They produce other shows that I like.  Umbrella Academy is a new favorite, for instance. I could just subscribe one month a year and binge, if I really felt the need. Their whole production model seems based on binging, anyway. I'm likely, though, to remain firm in my veto. I dislike supporting businesses whose practices make life more difficult.

So... no more money for you, Netflix, until you clean up your business and start acting like a proper citizen. I won't give you a dime until you start paying taxes that help pay for infrastructure, research, military, and so many other social projects that you require to run your business. Seriously, the internet was developed through tax money. The hypocrisy is stunning.  The very existence of Netflix today depends upon taxes paid by other people and businesses before Netflix arrived.

Contribute, already.
mellowtigger: (changed priorities)
Type the words "Hillary Clinton is" into Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Really, I'm not kidding. Do it yourself. Do it now. I'll wait.

Don't trust what I say, just because you read it on the internet.  Go to the search engines. Type the phrase into the search box yourself.

You'll get suggestions like these when I searched those words tonight.

google resuilts for "Hillary Clinton is"Yahoo results for "Hillary Clinton is"Bing results for "Hillary Clinton is"

You might think these preliminary suggestions are customized specifically for me (they're supposed to be), except that I abundantly use Google resources, so they should know my political opinions. I'm a liberal who supported Bernie Sanders, opposes Hillary Clinton's candidacy, and will not vote for her.

Now go read this long story from the former editor-in-chief of Psychology Today. You'll wish you were wearing a tin foil hat.
The article starts slowly with some background storytelling to set the mood, but the very important bits are farther down into the text. They tried manipulating the opinions of their test subjects, and they were quite effective.

What we actually found was astonishing. The proportion of people favouring the search engine’s top-ranked candidate increased by 48.4 per cent, and all five of our measures shifted toward that candidate. What’s more, 75 per cent of the people in the bias groups seemed to have been completely unaware that they were viewing biased search rankings. ...

Over the next year or so, we replicated our findings three more times, and the third time was with a sample of more than 2,000 people from all 50 US states. In that experiment, the shift in voting preferences was 37.1 per cent and even higher in some demographic groups – as high as 80 per cent, in fact. ...

It means that when people – including you and me – are looking at biased search rankings, they look just fine. So if right now you Google ‘US presidential candidates’, the search results you see will probably look fairly random, even if they happen to favour one candidate. ...

Writing in the New Republic in 2014, Jonathan Zittrain, professor of international law at Harvard University, pointed out that, given the massive amount of information it has collected about its users, Facebook could easily send such messages only to people who support one particular party or candidate, and that doing so could easily flip a close election – with no one knowing that this has occurred. And because advertisements, like search rankings, are ephemeral, manipulating an election in this way would leave no paper trail. ...

Perhaps even more disturbing is that the handful of people who do show awareness that they are viewing biased search rankings shift even further in the predicted direction; simply knowing that a list is biased doesn’t necessarily protect you from SEME’s power. ...

The formation of The Groundwork prompted Julian Assange, founder of Wikileaks, to dub Google Clinton’s ‘secret weapon’ in her quest for the US presidency.

I'm so glad that I called attention recently to Google's failure to include Green Party candidate Jill Stein (and Transhumanist candidate Zoltan Istvan) in their search ranking results. Their favoritism was too obvious, I guess.

It's bad enough that I have to distrust all electronic voting machines. We use paper ballots here in Minnesota, so we have a trustworthy validation mechanism. Your area may differ. It's even worse that I have to distrust all media because it has consolidated to the point that only a few individuals can shape the message across vast swaths of broadcast, print, and online sources of news. Now, sadly, I have reason to distrust the primary interface to the internet: search engines.

I think the only real solution will be for all of us to have personal artificial intelligence assistants on our machines that we can direct to search data for us and present us with opinions that haven't been manipulated by any influence but our own fallible selves. Maybe we can start with open source web crawlers and search engines. I installed a useful one a few years ago on Windows before I made the switch to Linux Mint, but now I can't remember which package it was. Sorry, I don't have any recommendations tonight. Let me know if you have one that you like.

Profile

mellowtigger: (Default)
mellowtigger

About

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
8 910 111213 14
15 16 17 18 192021
22 2324 25262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Page generated 2025-Jul-01, Tuesday 09:50 am