mellowtigger: (Default)
[personal profile] mellowtigger
My organization (AHS) made local news a few weeks ago when it received 120 cats from a hoarder in a mobile home.  Shortly afterwards, we again made news after the community was informed that all of those cats were euthanized.

I can't speak for AHS, and I don't work directly with animals so I don't have access to information about the details of this case.  This case, though, still bothered me.   It may be that something good will come of this experience....

Once again, my coworkers impress me with their commitment to the care of animals under our roof.  I went in for an early meeting today in which we discussed and brainstormed ways to improve in 3 areas of performance.  One topic of discussion was our euthanasia rates.  Our organization is committed to being an open-door facility.  That means we do not turn away any animal that someone brings to us.  I agree with that policy wholeheartedly.  It also means, though, that some animals brought through our doors will not be adoptable because of health or temperament.  What to do in these cases is where all the emotion and concern become apparent.  The limits of our budget and facilities come face to face with the consequences of handing an animal over to an eager "parent" at our adoption desk. 

Can we accept the ethical responsibility of placing an aggressive animal with a person who thinks they can train the animal to better behavior?  Even if they have children in the house too?  Can the human community around us trust us if we release to a new owner an animal that we consider dangerous?  Can the person afford the medical procedures that we know an animal will require?  What if the animal will always be a carrier of disease, then does the health of the animal population outweigh the life of the individual animal?  Can we trust ourselves to test a dog for food aggression when it's obviously been malnourished?  Wouldn't we get aggressive at our first few real meals in a long while?

There are lots of good questions that I don't have good personal answers for.  I really like the idea of spay/neuter-then-release programs that some cities have.  They take stray cats, "fix" them so they can't reproduce, then return them to their alleyways.  Seems like a decent idea at first, since it reduces the overpopulation problem that brings animals to our doorsteps.  Then I look around our adoption floor and notice far too many cats with missing ear parts.  I assume that some of them have been lost to frostbite.  Who knows how many other cats died in the freezing weather here.  Maybe spay/neuter-then-release isn't such a humanitarian procedure when we live in this very cold climate.  I can't decide where I stand on this issue any more.

Still, I want AHS to remain an open-door facility.  Change can still happen here.  We do believe that there is room for improvement.  I'm convinced that staff are completely dedicated to reducing euthanasia rates.  Apparently, we keep bringing up the issue with management whenever we are given the opportunity (like staff surveys and all-site retreat).  I'm convinced that we will find ways to give these animals other opportunities, even if AHS decides that euthanasia is the least-painful outcome in the future of an animal.  Now it's just a matter of ensuring that actual changes come into existence after all of these frank discussions.

As I drove into work today in -2F/-19C (-25F/-32C windchill), I considered applying for a job I saw posted in "Nowhere", Arizona.  It'd be desert, but it'd be warm at least.  But then I got to the early morning meeting, and I realized that change at AHS will happen as long as all these dedicated people stay to ensure that change happens.  I want to help play a part in bringing about that change.

Date: 2009-03-11 10:36 pm (UTC)
ext_173199: (Kitten Lick)
From: [identity profile]
It's quite true that trap/neuter/return is much less problematic in a climate like that of Los Angeles!

Given the situation with so many more animals than there are homes - shelters are forced into performing a sort of triage, deciding which can best benefit from what your resources can provide. I'm glad to hear the staff there is always thinking about ways to reduce the number of animals you have to euthanize.

Date: 2009-03-12 02:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I like my solution, fix them and put them in a big zoo like enclosure to fend for themselves yet be protected from larger animals/cars/environment. A big glass greenhouse dome perhaps, toss in the unwanted birds and rodents in there too. Let nature take it's course.

I for one find euthanasia monstrous, we don't put our family to sleep when they have become a burden or their end-life becomes painful.

Date: 2009-03-12 02:50 am (UTC)
ext_173199: (Blackness)
From: [identity profile]
Unfortunately, in most places we actively DENY euthenasia to dying people in pain who want a dignified exit. There is no "glory" in dying slowly in pain.

Date: 2009-03-12 03:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I don't know if "glory" or "dignity" are issues I concern myself with. I would contend there is no shame in dying slowly in pain either, or going out bawling for that matter.

Since I don't believe in any afterlife, I'm willing to squeeze every last breath out to get every last bit of life experience I can muster, no matter how painful it might be. If I die while awake I will die with my eyes open, like most animals do.

Of course, there are pain meds to help ease the physical pain. :oP

And on another note, it's one thing when people "choose" self-euthenasia for some perceived notion of dignity, it's a totally different thing to force it upon a beloved creature just because they have become too much a emotional/financial burden.

My own personal experience was when my mother decided to have our family cat, Poco, put down. I took her into my home instead, and she had 7 more years of life. Dying with her eyes open struggling for every breath on her favorite pillow. An Emotional roller coaster for me, sure, but I would not deny her her last experience. Even if there is nowhere to take that experience with her.

Date: 2009-03-12 04:54 am (UTC)
ext_173199: (BioHazard)
From: [identity profile]
Frankly, if my "experience" was nothing but pain, I'd WANT someone to "deny" me that. It's called mercy. I value quality of life far more than quantity.

Date: 2009-03-12 08:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
And hence this is where the "Golden Rule" falls apart.

Obviously neither one of us would want the other to do unto us what they would want for themselves.

And that's okay. :o)


mellowtigger: (Default)

September 2017

1718192021 2223
2425262728 2930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 20th, 2017 09:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios