the mellow tigger's musings

• Charlie Kirk's apparent political assassination:
  A whole lot of people are putting words into other people's mouths. Here are the things that Charlie Kirk said (free archive copy), that political leaders said, and that actual progressive commentators said. In that last video, skip to the 12-minute mark to hear what I hope is wise advice for how to responsibly prepare your mind to watch violent war footage, if you choose to do so. I haven't watched the snuff video. I have enough exposure to violence where I'm at, thanks.
• The USA President's health and ego:
  So, Trump disappeared for a week, which is highly unusual, then returns with a droopy half-face (at least temporarily), looking exactly like he had some kind of stroke. Then during his speech against the "radical left", Trump publishes a video where his hands and fingers glitch visually. According to this review of it, that video was not AI generated, merely badly edited. Both the editing (at all) and the quality (poorly done) are bothersome concepts in this context. Separately, there's a detail that is nagging at my brain. According to this story, the accused killer was caught at 10pm Thursday night. But what was the very first mention to the public of this apprehension? I cannot find a solid answer. It seems (without solid proof) that news was deliberately withheld from the USA public until Trump could go on Fox News on Friday morning and claim he was told about it just "5 minutes before I walked in." Oh, pleasant coincidence? Only after his statement, from what I can find, did other press conferences happen that morning. I want to be wrong about this obscure detail of timing, because that level of national manipulation for Trump's personal benefit is just... unconscionable. Why was the USA kept ignorant overnight on what is obviously an issue of national importance... until Trump gets to play the role of important political strongman revealing such significant news in person to Fox & Friends? We got news about Luigi Mangione seemingly every hour for days. Please, prove me wrong on this issue.
• The ongoing USA civil war:
  I've mentioned stochastic terrorism on this blog several times in recent years. I think we will not properly address violence in the USA until we get a national legal definition of stochastic terrorism, so it can be objectively identified and punished in court. It will need to clarify what is not protected by the 1st Amendment. Likewise, I've said before that we need clarified what is not protected by the 2nd Amendment. Towards a solution for that problem, I think more states need state defense forces which cannot be controlled by the federal government. (Florida also started one recently.) Why? I think that federal law should require that all citizens be active members of those state forces, or members of federal military units, before they're allowed military weapons. Not everyone (and literally their children too) should have them. Make actual military units (which any citizen can potentially join) responsible for the use of their weapons. I think that culpability would put a quick end to idiots taking weapons whenever they want and firing them whenever they want. Possession of any military weapon without a military unit's explicit orders would be a punishable offense. That still leaves handguns (and 3D-printed ones) out there for potential misuse, but we have to start somewhere. It will require new constitutional amendments to make those changes. We should've started that process after Columbine. Until adoption of these (and other) new amendments, so-called blue states could financially starve and delay fascist government by pursuing economic secession.
• Ukraine:
  I agree with this vlogger who says that Russia is sending drones into NATO countries, not because Putin thinks NATO will react. Putin knows NATO will not react. Instead, Putin does it because triggering worries in those populations might convince them to hoard their defense supplies instead of sending them to Ukraine. That's actually a shrewd military plan. I hope the NATO countries don't succumb to it.
• Climate change:
  We're supposed to be in the midst of a La Niña year, but temperatures didn't really cool off globally. In addition, we're learning that very unusual breaks are happening in air and water and species migration patterns. We've got 1 more year expected of this La Niña, then 2027 (or late 2026) should shift back to El Niño, when things start heating up again. The last El Niño set some bad global records, but we'll start next time from another high point.
• Privacy:
  I've tried explaining before that the only privacy that matters is what happens inside your own brain. We keep getting better at decoding brainwaves. We need a guarantee of absolute, inviolable (under any imagined emergency circumstance) privacy within our own bodies, and it needs to be encoded directly into the national constitution as a new amendment. Urgently. I think maybe I'm prepared for technological telepathy, but I'm increasingly sure that the rest of humanity is not capable of resisting the allure of knowing what other people think... or enduring the consequence of actually knowing those thoughts.
• UFOs:
  I still feel a bit of embarrassment (I think it is) at my mention of supposedly-trustworthy news 2 years ago about an archaeological find in Peru, which turned out to be false. So I've been more guarded than usual on any UFO news. There was new testimony at the U.S. Congress last week. Apparently-reputable people testified where there are very real legal consequences, so I'm trusting one particular story as accurate first-person information. Like this video (MSN.com) of an Air Force veteran describing what sounds very much like stealth technology. A practical invisibility screen that can be turned on and off at will, not just difficult-to-radar surfaces. There's a longer video here (YouTube) of the Congressional testimony with even more footage of another flying craft. That UFO takes a missile hit, survives, appears to start tumbling, yet it and shrapnel pieces near it keep flying on the same trajectory, not falling down at all. That is not aerodynamic propulsion. That is something new. Given how easily our tools (including AI tools) can generate false text, images, speech, and video, it's important to stay skeptical, especially if somebody's selling something. I don't know what's going on, but I'm certain that my government is lying to the public and to Congress, which is supposed to have regulatory oversight of the military forces of the USA.

This announcement is too important to wait for Moody Monday.

Read the news.

Watch the presentation.

Read the English translation.

The summary:

• Bodies found preserved in a mine in Peru several years ago.
• These humanoid bodies are about 1000 years old.
• They have 3 fingers and 3 toes, with enlarged and extended skulls. Bone structure is light, like a bird.
• They have eggs in their abdomen, like bird eggs.
• They have fingerprints that are linear instead of whorled.
• They have large metal implants, and cadmium and osmium have been identified.
• Their dna is more different from humans than bacteria are different from humans, suggesting they are not of Earth origin.

I wish I could just take the day off from work to dive into every detail. There are reputable institutions involved, but is this presenter reputable? Maybe not, but this would be a complex lie to achieve.

We just had 3 credible professionals give sworn testimony (on penalty of perjury, although that's seldom enforced) which collectively claims that UFO presence in USA airspace is practically commonplace; that these UFOs can disable (not the same as merely evade) our electronic detection systems; that USA has UFOs, alien technology, and alien beings in our possession; that our Defense department cooperates with corporations to illegally siphon money from the government to fund their own private research; and that US citizens have been harmed, perhaps even killed, to keep these secrets hidden.

Beware, though, of two particular criticisms about what happened.

1. "No real details were provided."
   That's right. They were not spoken in public that day in front of cameras. Keep in mind, though, that David Grusch passed the details of his claims to an Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. That Inspector General then passed the summary to Congress, indicating that these claims were both "urgent" and "credible". (That document link provided by PBS.) This congressional committee wanted a SCIF to hear the details that same day, but they were denied access to one for this hearing. This critique applies only to a portion of the import of this event.
2. "Without solid evidence of UFOs and aliens, this testimony was pointless."
   Wrong. So wrong that it borders on distraction. The importance of this testimony was not just about UFOs. It was about a decades-long history of illegal activity and criminal suppression of information by a faction within the U.S. Government. The most dangerous claim offered that day was that we have a government-within-government that operates with no oversight. Remember: "urgent" and "credible".